Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents et al
as 1:2013cv01763
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents, Joy Flowers Conti, Thomas Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of Federal Judges and United States Covert Government Agents, Joy Flowers Conti, Thomas Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sam H. James, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 08-5448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sam H. James, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Court of Appeals, For the Third Circuit and others
Gbeke Awala v. United States Court Of Appeals, et al
as 08-3564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
