Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Espinoza v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03983
Plaintiff:
Adrien Joshua Espinoza
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Mangan, T Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez #160841 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Edwin Sanchez
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, A Martinez, F Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catano v. Urby et al
as 4:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Catano
Defendant:
Unknown Urby, Unknown Winslow, Unknown Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russett et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Christopher Russett , Delia Russett , Ashley Yunck and others
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Charles L Ryan , Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bertanelli v. Walker et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Walker, Unknown Smith-Whitson, Unknown Heat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02603
Plaintiff:
Dylan Henderson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Marlene Coffey, Keith Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Walker et al
as 4:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Walker, Unknown Smith-Whitson, Unknown Heat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ramos et al
as 4:2015cv00486
Petitioner:
Daniel Fitzgerald Smith
Respondent:
Unknown Ramos and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bertanelli v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2015cv02015
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Smith-Whitson, Unknown Walker, Unknown Heat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suazo v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
Diego Suazo
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Corizon Health Incorporated, Corizon Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
