Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Nails v. UPS Delivery Services et al
as 5:2015cv00623
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
UPS Delivery Services , Joe Vickers and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dozier v. Armstrong et al (MAG+)
as 1:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mary L.R. Dozier
Defendant:
Lawton Armstrong, Robert Bentley, Butch Binford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingmire v. Bruner et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
Charles David Ingmire
Defendant:
Perez Bruner, Carl Rowe and Lynn Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
First Commercial Bank v. Vickers
as 2:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
First Commercial Bank
Defendant:
T. Owen Vickers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cherch v. Mock et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cherch
Defendant:
Jim Mock , Tyler Dean Hurst , Corporal Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Deidra Monet Blanchard , Joshua Blackmon , Cynthia Britton and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Chuck Hagel, Michael C Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Richardson Dozier v. Vickers et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Richardson Dozier
Defendant:
Cherlene Vickers, Douglas Valeska, Lawton Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Corey D Keith v. Munoz et al
as 2:2012cv01996
Plaintiff:
Estate of Corey D Keith
Defendant:
Cesar Munoz, Hillcrest Behavioral Health Systems, Samuel S Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osborne v. Guthrie et al
as 5:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Osborne
Defendant:
Thomas Guthrie, Vickers, Brian Jones and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
