Cases 21 - 30 of 291
Best et al v. Tiadaghton Valley Regional Police et al
as 4:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Colin J. Best, Melissa M. Best and E.E.B.
Defendant:
Tiadaghton Valley Regional Police, City of Jersey Shore, County of Lycoming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PLAIR v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
WADE PLAIR
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, BLAIR COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Snook et al
as 4:2021cv01333
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. White
Defendant:
Morgan Snook, Chris Benson, Ryan Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice, II v. MDC PARTNERS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01430
Defendant:
CHARLENE BARSHEFSKY, IRWIN D SIMON, WADE OOSTERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BRADY v. WOOLF
as 2:2020cv01978
Petitioner:
JOHN BRADY and JOHN WADE
Respondent:
SCOTT A. WOOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VIGNA et al v. WOOD et al
as 2:2020cv06337
Plaintiff:
WADE VIGNA and SALLY CARY
Defendant:
MARYANNE WOOD and KEVIN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Stephens et al
as 3:2020cv02329
Defendant:
Donald B. Stephens and Solid Waste Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE et al v. MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. et al
as 2:2020cv05750
Plaintiff:
MERCK & CO., INC. and JOYCE WADE
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAINOR v. SUPT. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
RICHARD DIBELLA, C.O. YO-YO, C.O. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANDERSON et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03552
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
LINDA ANDERSON and WADE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
