Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Cope v. Ruebin
as 2:2011cv01965
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Defendant:
Ruebin
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Webb et al
as 2:2011cv00865
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Defendant:
Webb and Nurse
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Giles et al
as 2:2010cv02356
Petitioner:
Gerald Cope
Respondent:
L. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Lucky et al
as 2:2010cv01206
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Defendant:
Dan Lucky, John Oddo and City of Birmingham
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Thoamios (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00761
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Cope
Defendant:
Russell Thoamios
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Payne v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Clarence Payne
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Patrick LeBlanc, Gary Copes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Senn v. Pike County Commissioners et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00919
Plaintiff:
James S. Senn
Defendant:
Pike County Commissioners, Olivia Pearce and Willie Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Copes et al
as 2:2007cv01260
Plaintiff:
John Spencer Young
Defendant:
Gary Copes, Stephen Bullard and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Govan v. The State of Louisiana et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2007cv00604
Plaintiff:
Marion Govan
Defendant:
The State of Louisiana, Steven Bullard and Gary Copes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scofield et al v. The City of Florala et al
as 2:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Clyde Scofield, Clyde Scofield, Tina Scofield and others
Defendant:
The City of Florala, Alabama and Neil Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
