Cases 21 - 30 of 191
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07170
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burrow et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Eddie Burrow, Carl Frazier, Raymond Gilbert and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Burrow et al v. 3M Company et al
as NYS/1:22-CV-00465
Plaintiff:
Burrow, Eddie Burrow, Carl Frazier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Burrow et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Eddie Burrow, Carl Frazier, Raymond Gilbert and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03701
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ravestein v. Douglas County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00442
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Douglas County, Nebraska, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Ravestein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Gomes et al
as 6:2021cv01885
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lee Holt
Defendant:
Jeriel Gomes, William Young and Mason Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Young
as 6:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Holt
Defendant:
William Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Young
as 6:2021cv01595
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Holt
Defendant:
William Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
