Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 7:2012cv00051
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Lewis T Babcock, Richard H Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Warren Skillern v. Lisa Wood, et al
as 11-15086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN R. SKILLERN
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA G. WOOD, WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., B. A. EDENFIELD and others
Warren Skillern v. Lisa Wood, et al
as 11-14508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN R. SKILLERN
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA GODBEY WOOD, WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., B. AVANT EDENFIELD and others
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 5:2011cv01301
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
John Ley, William T Moore, G R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren Skillern v. B. Edenfield, et al
as 11-12730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN R. SKILLERN
Defendant - Appellee:
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, Federal Judge, WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., Federal Judge, JAMES E. GRAHAM, Federal Magistrate Judge and others
Skillern v. Wood et al
as 4:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Warren R. Skillern
Defendant:
Lisa G. Wood, William T. Moore, B.A. Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skillern v. Edenfield et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Warren Skillern
Defendant:
B. Avant Edenfield, William T. Moore, James E. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William T. Moore v. Fibreboard Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91554
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corporation
Plaintiff:
William T. Moore
Patterson v. Moore et al
as 4:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant:
William T. Moore, Jr., Lamar W. Davis, John S. Dalis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stanford v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia et al
as 5:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jarrod Stanford
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia and William T. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
