Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Winburn v. Griffith et al
as 2:2022mc51188
Plaintiff:
Robert Winburn
Defendant:
Griffith, Todd Redman, K. Napier and others
Robert Johnson v. Plymouth Rock Assurance, et al
as 22-1465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE, DIANNE M. BENAUGH, MICHAEL R. WHEELER and others
JOHNSON v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE et al
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE, DIANNE M. BENAUGH, MICHAEL R. WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosalind Holmes v. USA, et al
as 21-3715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSALIND HOLMES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES B. COMEY, Former Director of the FBI, official capacity, ADMIRAL MICHAEL RODGERS, Former Director of the National Security Agency, official capacity and others
Rosalind Holmes v. USA, et al
as 21-3521
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT STILES, Former City Council Member Councilman, individual and official capacity, JEFFREY BLACKWELL, Former Cincinnati Police Chief, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH CALIGIURI, Disciplinary Counsel, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSALIND HOLMES
Rosalind Holmes v. USA, et al
as 21-3520
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT STILES, Former City Council Member Councilman, individual and official capacity, JEFFREY BLACKWELL, Former Cincinnati Police Chief, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH CALIGIURI, Disciplinary Counsel, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSALIND HOLMES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
