Cases 21 - 30 of 75
DUNN JR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2019cv04712
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRIAN WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
JAMES EVERETT DUNN JR and JAMES EVERETT DUNN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DUNN v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2019cv04692
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
JAMES EVERETT DUNN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sturgill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
Everett D Sturgill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EASLEY-EL v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv03138
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, V. SHEPHERD, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00477
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
John R Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JULIAN et al v. TOWN OF SUMMITVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv02231
Defendant:
TOWN OF SUMMITVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWN MCGUIRE, TOM EVERETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JULIAN and TIFFANY JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Merriweather v. Payne et al
as 3:2018cv00827
Defendant:
T Windmiller, Everett, Payne and others
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Dorris W Merriweather, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HODGES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02348
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
EVERETTE LARRY HODGES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
