Cases 21 - 30 of 37,538
Bagola v. Department of Social Services
as 3:2024cv03014
Plaintiff:
Doreen C. Bagola
Defendant:
Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sophia Wilansky v. Morton County, North Dakota, et al
as 24-1911
Plaintiff:
Sophia Wilansky
Defendant:
Morton County, North Dakota, Kyle Kirchmeier, in his official capacity, Thomas Iverson, in his personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
TeLissah R Johnson
Defendant:
MO Jackson County, Eric Lyles and Joseph Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
