Cases 31 - 40 of 308
Summers v. Omaha Police Department et al
as 8:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Heather Summers
Defendant:
Omaha Police Department, Douglas County Sheriff Department, Sarpy County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kujath v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2021cv00376
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kujath
Defendant:
City of Omaha, John Does 1-100 and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabrikant v. Q Link Wireless, LLC
as 4:2021cv03194
Plaintiff:
Ben Fabrikant
Defendant:
Q Link Wireless, LLC and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Chernyy v. Roesler et al
as 8:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anna J Chernyy and Anna J. Chernyy
Defendant:
Monty Roesler, John Doe I, Alan Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Keup v. Sarpy County et al
as 8:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Adam Keup
Defendant:
Sarpy County, Jeff Davis and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Committe v. The University of Nebraska System et al
as 8:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
Bruce Committe
Defendant:
The University of Nebraska System, The University of Nebraska - Omaha and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miller v. Omaha Dep of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Omaha Dep of Corrections, John Doe and Jane Skinner
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Spanish Quotes, Inc.
as 8:2021cv00244
Defendant:
Spanish Quotes, Inc. an Arizona Corporation doing business as We Speak Insurance and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Regan Smith
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Carroll v. Douglas County et al
as 8:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jaron L Carroll and Jaron L. Carroll
Defendant:
Douglas County, Director Michael Myers, Michael Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boehm v. Pig Art Graphics LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Pig Art Graphics LLC and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Andrew Boehm
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
