Cases 31 - 40 of 470
Pacheco v. Owen et al
as 5:2023ct03329
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Dr. Owen, Dr. Snee, Dr. Bernabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Partin v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023ct03339
Plaintiff:
Courtney Garvin Partin
Defendant:
Warden Scarantino, Dr. Cloutier, Dr. Sharf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Keister v. Wake County District Attorney Office et al
as 5:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Francis Keister
Defendant:
Wake County District Attorney Office, Lorrin Freeman, City of Raleigh and others
Doe v. Sultan
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Fard Sultan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00820
Defendant:
Jane Doe, American Airlines Group, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Green v. Does et al
as 3:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Rodarius Green and Rod Wave
Defendant:
John & Jane Does and ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
BERMUDEZ-BEY et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Kani Adon Bermudez-Bey, Shon Green and REGIS KISHON GREEN
Defendant:
MARY KRISTINE (KRISTY) COLE, TERRY S. JOHNSON, CLIFF PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRANKLIN v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
JOY G. FRANKLIN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE RETIREMENT BOARD FOR DUKE UNIVERSITY and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Haze v. Medical Provider et al
as 5:2023ct03300
Plaintiff:
Grant Ruffin Haze, III
Defendant:
Medical Provider, Nurse Jane Doe 1, Nurse Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Divine v. Buchholtz et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Versa Divine and Marcus Devan Hunter
Defendant:
Peter R. Buchholtz, Kimberly D. Grande, Harold Reep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
