Cases 31 - 40 of 593
Randolph v. USA
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. WADDEL et al
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, JASON ADAMS, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. MAUNEY et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
DEANNA COLEMAN and AUGUSTINE PEREZ
Defendant:
CHASE MAUNEY, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE, ADAM D MOSQUEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kahoul v. Grant et al
as 5:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Adam Benallel and Lina Kahoul
Defendant:
Kaitlyn Grant and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2023ct03338
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and DAC of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
