Cases 31 - 40 of 6,256
Harris v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Ramsey William Harris
Defendant:
Vincent Vantell and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strobl et al v. Croft et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stacy Strobl and Brian Harding
Defendant:
Paul Croft, Jonathan Frost, Rhino Onward International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harrison v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Harrison
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., Prospect Airport Services, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Zebb v. The James Lee House, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
Stacee Zebb
Defendant:
The James Lee House, LLC, AK Employer Services, LLC, Tec-Print LLC and others
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #057 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe #057
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
