Cases 31 - 40 of 1,085
Smith v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Warden Christopher Schell, Franklin County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Jesus Dejesus Gonzalez
Defendant:
J. Franklin and SUPERINTENDENT Ramson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRONSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
TANYA BRONSON
Defendant:
FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Franklin v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Delbert Franklin
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman, Jill Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. FRANKLIN et al
as 2:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
JESUS DEJESUS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
J. FRANKLIN and SUPERINTENDENT RAMSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2023cv02931
Plaintiff:
TINA THOMPSON
Defendant:
FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Harris v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2023cv02933
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Greene v. Franklin et al
as 1:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
Roshawon Greene
Defendant:
Leslie Franklin and Destiny Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
