Cases 31 - 40 of 656
Bio Gen LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, John Timothy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Mills v. Huffman et al
as 4:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Luke Mills
Defendant:
Huffman, Tim Ryall and Walkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Huffman et al
as 4:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Luke Mills
Defendant:
Huffman, Tim Ryalls and Walkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Huffman et al
as 4:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Luke Mills
Defendant:
Huffman, Tim Ryall and Walkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Faulkner County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Cherresa Baker and Cherresa Kay Baker
Defendant:
Faulkner County Sheriff's Department, Faulkner County Detention Facility, Tim Ryals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Maskell v. Nichols
as 4:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Tim Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Raper v. Nichols
as 4:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Carrie Dawn Raper
Defendant:
Tim Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin
as 5:2023cv05105
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Tim Griffin
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Americans Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas and Electronic Frontier Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Nichols
as 2:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schiavo v. Phoenix Design Build, Inc.
as 6:2023cv06072
Plaintiff:
Tim Schiavo
Defendant:
Phoenix Design Build, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
