Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Howard v. Unknown Defendant(s)
as 2:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Veronica Janell Howard
Defendant:
Lee Arrendale State Prison, Lt. Spears, Lt. Applegarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Varga et al
as 3:2017cv50217
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Boykin
Defendant:
Varga and 3 John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. Young Adult Institute, Inc.
as 17-2022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Judith W. Lynn
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Joel M. Levy
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Young Adult Institute, Inc., in its individual capacity and in its capacity as administrator of the Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute and the Life Insruance Plan and Trust for Certain Management , Board of Trustees of Young Adult Institute, Inc., as administrator of the Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute, Pension Retirement Committee of the Board of Trustees of Young Adult Institute, as administrator of the Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute and others
Defendant:
Eliot P. Green, 1 John Doe, as trustees of the Supplemental Pension Plan for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute, 2 John Doe, as trustees of the Supplemental Pension Plan for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute and others
Brooks III v. City Of Freeport et al
as 3:2017cv50173
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Brooks III
Defendant:
City Of Freeport, Police Department, Officer 1(John Doe) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. Young Adult Institute, Inc.
as 17-1797
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Judith W. Lynn
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Joel M. Levy
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Young Adult Institute, Inc., in its individual capacity and in its capacity as administrator of the Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute and the Life Insruance Plan and Trust for Certain Management , Board of Trustees of Young Adult Institute, Inc., as administrator of the Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute, Pension Retirement Committee of the Board of Trustees of Young Adult Institute, as administrator of the Supplemental Pension Plan and Trust for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute and others
Defendant:
Eliot P. Green, 1 John Doe, as trustees of the Supplemental Pension Plan for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute, 2 John Doe, as trustees of the Supplemental Pension Plan for Certain Management Employees of Young Adult Institute and others
Shawn Sutter v. Hilton Garden Inns Management, et al
as 17-11831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN LOUIS SUTTER, 1-3 John Doe And Jane Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
HILTON GARDEN INNS MANAGEMENT LLC and HILTON WORLD WIDE, INC.
Blond v. Bradt
as 16-3835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark W. Blond, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Noeth, Sergeant Leonard, Correction Officer Pritchard and others
Defendant:
Mark Bradt, Superintendent, K. Chappus, Superintendent of Security and Correction Officer Preacha
Wilfrid Perkins v. Unknown Berntsen, et al
as 16-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILFRID DALVIN PERKINS, AKA Wilfrid Perkins
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN BERNTSEN, Sgt. at Lower Buckeye Jail/ Maricopa County
Defendant:
UNKNOWN WATUS, Sgt. at Lower Buckeye Jail/ Maricopa County, M. W. STUMP, Lt. at Lower Buckeye Jail/ Maricopa County, K. WILSER, Lt. at Lower Buckeye Jail/ Maricopa County and others
Edison Peoples v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 16-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDISON ALEXANDER PEOPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden and others
Warren v. Livingston et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Travis Warren
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bryan Gordy, Garth Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
