Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Vasquez-Martinez v. USA
as 8:2017cv00151
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Vasquez-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. 1985 Chevrolet Astro Van, VIN IG8DM15N0FB188154
as 8:1991cv00317
Defendant:
1985 Chevrolet Astro Van, VIN 1G8DM15N0FB188154
Claimant:
Ruth Martinez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Martinez-Garcia v. USA
as 4:2016cv03171
Petitioner:
Yara Sujey Martinez Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez v. USA
as 4:2016cv03109
Petitioner:
Sonia Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rojas-Martinez v. USA
as 4:2016cv03041
Petitioner:
Alfredo Rojas-Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gutierrez Martinez v. Frakes
as 4:2015cv03156
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haltom v. Parks et al
as 8:2015cv00428
Defendant:
Stephanie Allison, Sharon Bartek, Marti Beard and others
Plaintiff:
John V. Haltom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Akins v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2015cv03059
Plaintiff:
Samar Akins
Defendant:
Dory M. Martinez and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. $64317.59 US Curr
as 8:1990cv00486
Defendant:
$64,317.59 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Ignacio E. Chavez, Jesus Chavez, Fuentes and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
