Cases 31 - 40 of 774
ARANA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12123
Plaintiff:
ARNOLDO ARANA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sharp v. Lynch et al.
as 3:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carlos Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON and others
Arana v. Molta et al
as 1:2023cv11133
Plaintiff:
Isabel Arana
Defendant:
Robert Molta, Catherine Molta and WeNeedAVacation.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Berumen v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Daniel Berumen
Defendant:
T. Jones, L. Carrasco, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARANAS, MD v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv02576
Plaintiff:
RAE ARANAS, MD
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and EXLSERVICE.COM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Hasan v. Arana
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Mansur-Abdul-Muhaiman: Hasan
Defendant:
Clarissa Marie Arana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalpesh Solanki v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Defendant:
Officer Arana, Officer Bonilla, Officer T. Cho and others
Plaintiff:
Kalpesh Solanki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert LeClair v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT LECLAIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS and HAROLD WICKHAM
Michael Rhymes v. John Keast, et al
as 23-15270
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL RHYMES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN KEAST and CANDIS RAMBUR
Defendant:
ARANAS, #7 FAC, T. WICKHAM, #7 FAC, GAYLENE, #7 FAC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
