Cases 31 - 40 of 18,922
Harris v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, John Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Black v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02563
Plaintiff:
William Black
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tolliver (PS) v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Chonteyaih Bailey, Imani Bailey, Gabrelle Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinka v. Earl G. Graves Ltd
as 1:2024cv03825
Plaintiff:
Paul Martinka
Defendant:
Earl G. Graves Ltd doing business as Black Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Integon National Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Lauren Black
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BLACK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Plaintiff:
DONNA A. BLACK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LEWIS D. FEREBEE, GEORGE GREENHOW and others
RDK NY INC v. Earl G. Graves Ltd
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff:
RDK NY INC
Defendant:
Earl G. Graves Ltd doing business as Black Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
