Cases 31 - 38 of 38
The DNA Sample of Individual known as: Jesus Cecilio Ceballos described as Male, White, Hispanic/Mexican/Latino, Black Hair, Brown Eyes, approximately 6'0" tall, weighing approximately 175 l
as 8:2010mj00287
Defendant:
The DNA Sample of Individual known as: Jesus Cecilio Ceballos described as Male, White, Hispanic/Mexican/Latino, Black Hair, Brown Eyes, approximately 6'0" tall, weighing approximately 175 l (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. The DNA Sample of Individual known as: Jesus Cecilio Ceballos described as Male, White, Hispanic/Mexican/Latino, Black Hair, Brown Eyes, approximately 6'0" tall, weighing approximately 175 l
as 8:2010mj00287
Defendant:
The DNA Sample of Individual known as: Jesus Cecilio Ceballos described as Male, White, Hispanic/Mexican/Latino, Black Hair, Brown Eyes, approximately 6'0" tall, weighing approximately 175 l (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Fox Ridge LLC v. L-1 Identity Solutions Inc.
as 1:2010cv00395
Plaintiff:
Fox Ridge LLC
Defendant:
L-1 Identity Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Applewood Controls, Inc. v. L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc.
as 1:2010cv10473
Plaintiff:
Applewood Controls, Inc.
Defendant:
L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Randy Williams Goad v. USA, et al
as 10-10714
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY WILLIAMS GOAD
Respondent - Appellee:
USA, FNU GUNTER, Mr. - USP 2 L-1 Unit Manager (UDC Chairman), FNU COX, Mr. - USP 2 G-2 Case Manager (UDC Chairman) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-10067
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardt v. McClendon, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00543
Plaintiff:
Patty Hardt
Defendant:
McClendon, LLC and L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
