Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Marrufo v. Faber and Brand LLC
as 1:2019cv00392
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Marrufo
Defendant:
Faber and Brand LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marrufo v. Couch et al
as 7:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Hector Marrufo
Defendant:
Danny Couch and Amber Couch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Marrufo v. Couch et al
as 5:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Hector Marrufo
Defendant:
Danny Couch and Amber Couch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
HYLAND v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv17779
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE HYLAND and HUMBERTO MARRUFO
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marrufo v. Molon Motor & Coil Corp.
as 1:2018cv07126
Defendant:
Molon Motor & Coil Corp.
Plaintiff:
Marissa Marrufo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARRUFO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08747
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE K MARRUFO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER , IMERYS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marrufo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv01664
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kateri Martina Marrufo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Banet v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00042
Defendant:
George C. Zoley, J. Wright, Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Hausmann-Alain Banet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banet v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00042
Defendant:
Clarence E. Anthony, Captain Barker, Norman Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Hausmann-Alain Banet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banet v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Hausmann-Alain Banet
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc., George C. Zoley, Anne Newman Forman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
