Cases 31 - 40 of 187
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-56194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL VILLARREAL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KENNETH J. POGUE, CDCR Director and others
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
Ismael Villarreal
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53496
Plaintiff:
JOSH ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mars v. Dumas et al
as 2:2021cv02145
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Mars
Defendant:
Captain Dumas, Sheriff Colby Runion, Deputy Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Franks et al
as 3:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
Frederick Bernard Moore
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Brent Cox, J Trowbridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13975
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER TOON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Dean Carter
as 21-15630
Defendant / Appellant:
DEAN ANTHONY CARTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Sams v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-15370
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL MIRANDA, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Office Services Supervisor 1, SANDRA SMITH, Trust Account Official and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Jesse Chacon v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-55182
Defendant / Appellee:
P. BIRDSONG, RALPH DIAZ, JEFFREY MACOMBER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE JUNIOR CHACON
Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv00281
Respondent:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Mr. Allen and others
Petitioner:
Javier E. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
