Cases 31 - 40 of 174
COCKERELL v. CONYESS et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2021cv01788
Defendant:
CONYESS, MAJOR CONYERS, DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY B COCKERELL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Likisha Clark v. City of Memphis, TN, et al
as 21-5542
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN WESTRICH, individually, and in his capacity as an officer of the Memphis Police Department
Defendant:
JON ALSUP, individually, and in his capacity as an officer of the Memphis Police Department, GARRETT O'BRIEN, individually, and in his capacity as an officer of the Memphis Police Department and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LIKISHA CLARK
Cockerell v. Conyess et al
as 3:2021cv00394
Defendant:
Davis, Conyess, Zatecky and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby B Cockerell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alsup v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00404
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Linda Alsup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALSUP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02535
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL EARL ALSUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale et al v. Alsup et al
as 5:2020cv01192
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company and Stephen Alsup
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hale and Kathryn Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 4:2020cv06694
Defendant:
Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, Judge Richard Seeborg and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Wade v. Alsup et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020mc80167
Defendant:
U.S. District Judge William H. Alsup, 9th Circuit Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson, 9th Circuit Judge Richard R. Clifton and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.