Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Smith v. NYCPD et al
as 1:2016cv05639
Plaintiff:
Jerome Smith
Defendant:
NYCPD, NYCPD 106th Precinct and Andres Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velez-Martinez et al v. NB Team Consulting Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02033
Plaintiff:
Nelson Velez-Martinez , Victor Navas-Mieres and Andres Gonzalez-Leon
Defendant:
NB Team Consulting Inc., Sasha Nunez and Darwind Palacios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cardenas et al v. Westside AG, Inc.
as 1:2016at00137
Plaintiff:
Atsiri Cardenas , Raul Pina , Honoria Garcia and others
Defendant:
Westside AG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Cardenas et al v. Westside AG, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
Atsiri Cardenas , Raul Pina , Honoria Garcia and others
Defendant:
Westside AG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Gonzalez-Velazquez
as 3:2016cv01257
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Andres Gonzalez-Velazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cesareo-Rosado v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2015cv01146
Plaintiff:
Yamil Doel Cesareo-Rosado
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, El Pueblo de Puerto Rico, Yolanda Cardona-Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Johnson et al
as 5:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , Thomas S. Winkowski , Cindy Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andres Gonzalez-Ruiz v. Attorney General United State
as 15-1088
Petitioner:
ANDRES GONZALEZ-RUIZ, AKA Andres Gonzalez
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Francisco Gonzalez Santos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71864
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ANDRES GONZALEZ SANTOS, AKA Francisco Gonzalez Santos
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Andres Gonzalez-Murcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60327
Petitioner:
ANDRES GONZALEZ-MURCIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
