Cases 31 - 40 of 304
Smith v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv04771
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Allied Trust Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20360
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnnie Henderson v. Charles Painter, et al
as 22-2456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE L. HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES PAINTER, Lieutenant, ANDREW SMITH, Officer and ANTHONY SCOLES, Correctional Officer
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13854
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10688
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ANDREW SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cupp v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2022cv04307
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cupp
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Andrew Smith, Todd Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10190
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
