Cases 31 - 40 of 2,046
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3330
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Richard Shreck v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Shreck
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Watkins v. Delaney et al
as 6:2023cv06104
Plaintiff:
Marceese Watkins
Defendant:
Sgt. Delaney and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Delaney et al
as 4:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Marceese Watkins
Defendant:
Delaney and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3067
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2919
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Reginald Dunahue v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-2840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Department of Correction, Jeremy C. Andrews, Warden, EARU, ADC and others
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, Captain, EARU, ADC, Latosha Davis, Lieutenant, EARU, ADC, Kathy Baxter, Corporal/S.E.T. Team, East Arkansas Maximum Security Unit, ADC (originally named as K Baxter) and others
Anthony Williamson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2740
Petitioner:
Anthony Brian Williamson
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Anthony Thrash v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2727
Petitioner:
Anthony Thrash
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Albert Lewis, Jr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2693
Petitioner:
Albert Lee Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
