Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Jesse Garza v. Armando Diaz
as 10-50347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARMANDO DIAZ, Detective, Bexar County Sheriff Officer In His Official and Individual Capacity
Osorio v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv60068
Plaintiff:
Leonel Osorio
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc., Jeff Bove, Maxine Headcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Armando Diaz-Pedraza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73966
Petitioner:
ARMANDO DIAZ-PEDRAZA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
DIAZ V DVA
as 09-7145
Claimant-Appellant:
Armando Diaz
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Armando Diaz Diaz v. Sugrue
as 1:2009cv01363
Petitioner:
Armando Diaz Diaz
Respondent:
J. Sugrue, J. Sugrue and J. Sugrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Diaz v. Jet Engine Technology Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv22286
Plaintiff:
Armando Diaz
Defendant:
Jet Engine Technology Corporation and Hernando Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jorge Diaz v. K. Prunty, et al
as 09-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE ARMANDO DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
K. W. PRUNTY, Undersecretary, N. GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals, B. GRICEWICH, Appeals Coordinator and others
Armando Diaz-Pedraza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70946
Petitioner:
ARMANDO DIAZ-PEDRAZA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Diaz-Holguin v. Holder, Jr.
as 09-9513
Petitioner:
DIMAS ARMANDO DIAZ-HOLGUIN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Untied States Attorney General, JANET NAPOLITANO, United States Department of Homeland Security Secretary and THOMAS G. SNOW, Executive Office for Immigration Review Acting Director
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. vs. Armando Diaz
as 2:2008cv07894
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Armando Diaz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
