Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Giddings v. Bobbi Jo
as 2:2022cv02388
Petitioner:
Gregory Giddings
Respondent:
Salamon Bobbi Jo, BOBBIE JO SALAMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullen v. Salamon et al
as 3:2022cv00953
Petitioner:
Christopher Mullen
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAIRSTON v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv00234
Petitioner:
KENNETH HAIRSTON
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, GEORGE LITTLE, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
Rodriguez-Arevalo v. Salamon et al
as 3:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Cesar Obdulio Rodriguez-Arevalo
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones, II v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Jones, II
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANCUSO v. SALAMON, et al.
as 2:2021cv05386
Plaintiff:
santo mancuso
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON and SCI ROCKVIEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEAPHART v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. LEAPHART
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY SMITH, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tejada v. PA State Attorney General
as 3:2021cv01771
Petitioner:
Ricky Tejada
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Bobbi Jo Salamon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2021cv01320
Petitioner:
TROY ROBINSON
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MACKLIN v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2021cv04048
Petitioner:
DARREN L. MACKLIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BOBBY JO SALAMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
