Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Kent v. Stone County, Arkansas et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Chris Kent
Defendant:
Stone County, Arkansas , Lance Bonds and Brad Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Democratic Party of Arkansas et al
as 3:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Democratic Party of Arkansas, Will Bond, Benton Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Bonds v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2016cv02031
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bonds
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Bond v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 2:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
James Bond
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Viele et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
David Viele , Beth Viele and Beth's Bail Bonds Inc
Defendant:
Larry E Peters , Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board , Curt Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Booker v. Bonds et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ryan Booker
Defendant:
Lance Bonds, Joe Bearden, Brenda Branscum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission v. Bunzai Media Group Inc et al
as 4:2015mc00016
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Bunzai Media Group Inc, Pinnacle Logistics Inc, DSA Holdings Inc and others
Receiver:
Charlene C Koonce
Federal Trade Commission v. BunZai Media Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2015mc00041
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
BunZai Media Group, Inc., Pinnacle Logistics, Inc., DSA Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Booher v. Doss et al
as 4:2015cv00328
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ryan Booher
Defendant:
J Doss, Lance Bonds, John Dan Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flatness et al v. Burnett et al
as 4:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Bill Flatness and Ashley Smith
Defendant:
Gary Burnett, Bobby Derden, Elmer Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
