Cases 31 - 40 of 48
BOSWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01053
Petitioner:
MICHAEL D. BOSWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lobacz v. The United States of America, et al
as 5:2019cv00453
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Medical and Other Staff John Does 1-10 and The United States of America
Petitioner:
Frank M. Lobacz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOBACZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
as 1:2019cv00497
Plaintiff:
Frank M Lobacz and FRANK M. LOBACZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Medical and Other Staff John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bussie v. BOP Secretary et al
as 5:2019hc02137
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Commerce Secretary and BOP Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bussie v. BOP Secretary et al
as 5:2019hc02116
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and BOP Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. Inch et al
as 5:2019ct03048
Defendant:
P.A. Shaw, Unit Manager Lesley, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Pierre Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bussie v. Clerk of Court et al
as 5:2015hc02310
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Clerk of Court, Unit Managers, Psychologist/Psychiatric Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ping v. Ratledge et al
as 5:2014ct03163
Plaintiff:
Shi Dong Ping
Defendant:
C. Ratledge, FMC Medical Review Committee and BOP Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Dunbar et al
as 5:2013hc02206
Petitioner:
David E. Simpson
Respondent:
Angela Dunbar, BOP Staff Attorneys and J. Scott Farr Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
GAMBLE v. BOP
as 1:2012cv01153
Petitioner:
EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
