Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Jason Parker v. Chiao, et al
as 16-3059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIAO, BARKMAN, Correction Officer, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD, RAYMOND A. NOVAK, KATE BARKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIS v. BARKMAN et al
as 2:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
LESLIE WILLIS
Defendant:
KATE BARKMAN and PROTHONOTARY FOR ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdullah Ibn-Sadiika v. Allegheny County Pennsylvania, et al
as 15-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDULLAH HANEEF IBN-SADIIKA
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS and KATE BARKMAN
Parker v. C/O Chiao et al
as 3:2015cv02374
Plaintiff:
Jason Parker
Defendant:
C/O Chiao, C/O Barkman, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Barkman et al
as 3:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
Jason Parker
Defendant:
Barkman, Reed, Styka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IBN-SADIIKA v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS et al
as 2:2015cv01052
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH HANEEF IBN-SADIIKA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. LNU et al
as 5:2015cv00724
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Michael McKeever, Nick LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Ronald Banks v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 15-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DANIEL GEHLMANN, Deputy Supt. for Facilities Mgmt., BARRY GRUBB, Major, MALLISA HAINESWORTH, Major of Unit Mgmt. and others
Barkman v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anne Barkman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
