Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Dale Pughsley v. A. Robinson
as 21-7326
Plaintiff / Appellant: DALE LEE PUGHSLEY, a/k/a Askari Danso MS Lumumba
Defendant / Appellee: A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, Each individually and in his official capacity, JAMILLA BURNEY-DIVINS, Each individually and in her official capacity, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Each individually and in his official capacity and others
Rigney v. Cabell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00479
Petitioner: Jason Scott Rigney
Respondent: Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rigney v. Cabell
as 3:2021cv00493
Petitioner: Jason Scott Rigney
Respondent: Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00380
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Cabell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00490
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Edwards
Respondent: Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raiford v. Clarke et al
as 1:2021cv00734
Defendant: M Foster, Russ, Jamie and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Raiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Pelletier v. Marcus Elam
as 21-7043
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM PELLETIER
Defendant / Appellee: MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator, BETH CABEL, Warden Sussex II and MR. BROWN, Hearing Officer for Sussex II
Dallas v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00349
Defendant: M Syes, Baldwin, Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Sharon Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodman v. Brooks et al
as 1:2021cv00522
Plaintiff: Mr. Lynwood A Goodman
Defendant: Beth Cabell, Michael Brooks and D Raines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Vandermark et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Plaintiff: Hector Escalante Vasquez
Defendant: M. Vandermark, R. Langford, K.S. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?