Cases 31 - 40 of 46
BOTTON v. NESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03950
Plaintiff:
NISSIM BOTTON
Defendant:
NESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , AHARON FOGEL, AJIT BHUSHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vogelfang v. Capra, et al
as 1:2010cv03827
Plaintiff:
Annette Vogelfang
Defendant:
NYS Dept. of Corrections, Brian Fisher, Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottone v. Killian
as 10-287
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alfred V. Bottone, Jr., Prisoner
Respondent - Appellee:
J.M. Killian, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10015
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Federal Trade Commission v. Kirkland Young LLC et al
as 1:2009cv23507
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Kirkland Young LLC, Kirkland Young LLC, David Botton and others
Receiver:
Mark F. Raymond
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Vogelfang v. Dept. of Security Capra et al
as 1:2009cv06642
Plaintiff:
Annette Vogelfang
Defendant:
Dept. of Security Capra, Brian Fischer, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bottone et al v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bottone, Mathew Deysenroth, Robert Diaz and others
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Bridgeport Civ Svc Comm and Ralph Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bottone et al v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2008cv01320
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bottone, Timothy Bottone, Timothy Bottone and others
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Bridgeport Civ Svc Comm and Ralph Jacobs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
