Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Bradley Kennedy v. Gerald Thompson, et al
as 19-15480
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, CHARLES L. RYAN and GERALD THOMPSON, Warden, Warden (ASPC - Eyman Complex)
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM KENNEDY, ADC #211800
Dillon v. Hawk et al
as 3:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Sharon Hawk, Pen Products, William Hyatt and others
Plaintiff:
Todd A Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley Monical v. Mike Winters, et al
as 18-35146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WINTERS, Ex-Sheriff, COREY FALLS, Ex-Sheriff, PENDLAND, Lt. and others
Kennedy v. Thompson et al
as 2:2017cv04300
Petitioner:
Bradley William Kennedy
Respondent:
Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley Monical v. Mike Winter, et al
as 17-35813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WINTER, Ex-Sheriff, COREY FALLS, Ex-Sheriff, PENDLAND, Lt. and others
BRADLEY-WILLIAMS v. AGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03755
Plaintiff:
MELINDA BRADLEY-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC. and DURHAM INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monical v. USA
as 1:2017cv00474
Petitioner:
Bradley William Monical
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Monical v. Winters et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Defendant:
Anderson, Sgt. Beane, Deputy Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley William Monical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monical v. Towers et al
as 3:2017cv00501
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Michael F. Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley William Monical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Lance Williams
as 17-1035
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Lance Bradley Williams, also known as Crush, also known as Lil'Crush
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
