Cases 31 - 40 of 658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spear-Zuleta v. USA
as 3:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Ronald Christopher Spear-Zuleta
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Marshall v. Zentek et al
as 3:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Marshall, Sr. and Aaron Christopher Marshall, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Zentek and Maureen Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainville v. Godfrey et al
as 3:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Normand P. Rainville
Defendant:
Christopher Godfrey, Jared S., Lisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Chudney Baker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Bronelle, Laune Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Uconn Health et al
as 3:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Christopher Calhoun
Defendant:
Uconn Health, Ersilda Ajce, Natalie J Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
Chudney Baker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Bronelle, Laune Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chiarilli v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Chiarilli
Defendant:
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
