Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Richardson v. Inmate Records Supervisor et al
as 4:2012cv03498
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Inmate Records Supervisor, Kela Thomas, Valerie Suber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richardson v. Haley et al
as 4:2012cv02850
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Kela Thomas, Valerie Suber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richardson v. Reynolds
as 4:2012cv00948
Petitioner:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Respondent:
Cecilia R Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beasley et al v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv02765
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Beasley, John Cloud, Wilbert Johnson and others
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02672
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
USA v. Curtis Lolley
as 10-30738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS DALE LOLLEY
Curtis Richardson v. South Carolina Department of C
as 09-8017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE EAGLETON, individually and officially, CAPTAIN ROGERS, et al. individually and officially and others
Curtis Richardson v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 09-8021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE EAGLETON, individually and officially, CAPTAIN ROGERS, individually and officially and others
Curtis Richardson v. South Carolina Department of C
as 09-7916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, individual and official capacity, HIPP, Lieutenant, Individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.