Cases 31 - 40 of 700
Lothes v. City of Elkins et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lothes
Defendant:
City of Elkins, Elkins Police Department and Christopher Boatwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. ICG Beckley, LLC
as 5:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Allen and Samantha Allen
Defendant:
ICG Beckley, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Laird v. Brammer
as 1:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Tammy Laird
Respondent:
Christopher Brammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Niederkorn v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Niederkorn
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wuori v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Wuori
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chafin v. Gier et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Chafin
Defendant:
Brandon Gier, Cpl. Craig, Jason Hutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Christopher Dukes
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Light v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colton Light
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, South Central Regional Jail, Christopher Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niederkorn v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Niederkorn
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chafin v. North Central Regional Jail Officers
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
