Cases 31 - 40 of 192
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Girard et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Edward Dionta White
Defendant:
Officer Girard and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Edward Dionta White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Officer Girard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, et al
as 23-5001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARNEST JOE FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, LUCAS TEMPLE, Officer and CHERISH COMFORT, Officer
Ahmadi v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Omid Ahmadi
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Municipal Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hankins v. Ehrenrich et al
as 4:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hankins, Jr
Defendant:
Darin Ehrenrich and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson et al v. Reneau et al
as 4:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Tim Wilson
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Tulsa
Defendant:
Bruce Reneau and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gatling v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Altaneisha Gatling
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Christopher R Beyerl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
