Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Consumers Energy Company v. SCR-Tech, LLC
as 2:2014cv11667
Defendant:
SCR-Tech, LLC
Plaintiff:
Consumers Energy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Midland Cogeneration Venture, et al v. FERC
as 14-1020
Petitioner:
Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Consumers Energy Company and Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Henderson et al v. Consumers Energy Company
as 1:2012cv01266
Defendant:
Consumers Energy Company
Plaintiff:
Tammy Henderson , Thomas P Henderson and Thomas P Henderson, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act
Jaynes v. Consumers Energy Company et al
as 1:2012cv14304
Plaintiff:
Karen Jaynes
Defendant:
Consumers Energy Company and Utility Workers Union of America AFL-CIO Local 129
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al.
as 5:2009cv00191
Defendant:
Central Regional Hospital, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever formerly known as Lever Bros. doing business as Unilever, Consumers Energy Company and others
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Carolina Power & Light Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2009cv00190
Defendant:
The Holladay Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina Power & Light Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
