Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Daniel Hood v. William Sullivan
as 18-71091
Petitioner:
DANIEL ROGER HOOD
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Prince v. Deeds et al
as 4:2017cv00770
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jefferson Prince
Defendant:
Roger Deeds, Joshua Lane, Cory Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Deeds et al
as 3:2017cv02566
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jefferson Prince
Defendant:
Roger Deeds, Joshua Lane, Cory Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Rogers, Sr. v. Jim Hood
as 17-60271
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY DANIEL ROGERS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY OUTLAW, Warden, Marshall County Correctional Facility
Daniel Hood v. Director of the California Dep
as 17-55395
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ROGER HOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
DaNiel Rogers
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Manley, Deas & Kochalski, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Intermountain Specialized Abuse Treatment Center et al
as 2:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Intermountain Specialized Abuse Treatment Center, Michael Robinson, Jeremy Etherington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Hood et al
as 3:2016cv00039
Petitioner:
Jeremy Daniel Rogers, Sr.
Respondent:
Jim Hood and Marshall L. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hood v. Director of the California Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv01564
Petitioner:
Daniel Roger Hood
Respondent:
Director of the California Department of Corrections, .
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luna v. Knutson Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00475
Plaintiff:
Luna, Guillermo Luna, Elizabeth Luna and others
Defendant:
Knutson Mortgage Corporation, Bank of America NA and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
