Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Vargas v. Howell et al
as 2:2014cv01942
Defendant:
Elko County, Richard Gloeckner, Amber Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Daniel Vargas Valencia et al
as 8:2014cv01450
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Daniel Vargas Valencia and Socorro Vargas
Daniel Vargas v. Communication Workers of America
as 5:2014cv02502
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
Communication Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Daniel Vargas-Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70474
Petitioner:
DANIEL VARGAS-GUTIERREZ, AKA Daniel Bargas, AKA Daniel V. Gutierrez, AKA Jorge Gutierrez Jimenez, AKA Jorge Jimenez, AKA Daniel G. Vargas
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Daniel Vargas-Ramirez
as 12-16458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL VARGAS-RAMIREZ
Vargas et al v. Honghua America, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv02403
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas and Jose Jimenez
Defendant:
Honghua America, LLC, Mi Zhang, Jie Ren and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. Jose Vargas-Velasquez
as 09-10626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE DANIEL VARGAS-VELASQUEZ
Daniel Vargas v. A-bex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-73205
Defendant:
A-bex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VARGAS v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73205
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VARGAS, DANIEL VARGAS, DANIEL VARGAS and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
