Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Vargas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv03429
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01300
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00005
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vargas v. USA
as 3:2025cv01136
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Rivera et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Defendant:
Edwin Rivera and Daniel Vargas Alvarado
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
VARGAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18292
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VARGAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Washington v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Candice Washington
Defendant:
Omar Daniel Vargas Sanchez, Southern Heavy Haul, Inc, Trisura Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Vargas v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2023cv50239
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
