Cases 31 - 40 of 170
James Dar, LLC v. OJCommerce, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05422
Defendant:
OJCommerce.com, Inc., OJCOMMERCE, LLC and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
James Dar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Dar et al
as 4:2021cv00238
Defendant:
Bobby Allen Dobyns, J and J Appliance, LLC and Inayat Dar
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Mario Sanchez, Anne Darring, Ralph Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Warren Paxton, Tammy Cisernos, Ralph Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Office of Attorney General - Child Support Division et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Interactive Services, Ralph Willis, Casa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabrera Mendez v. Echeverria et al
as 4:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Darling Ingredients, Inc, Eddy Echeverria, Dar Pro Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Cabrera Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HESTER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
DONALD C. MCCORMICK, CARLTON M. HADDEN, BRAD BAUDEK and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
