Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Morgan, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 20-6021
Petitioner:
STEVEN GLEN CRADDOCK, JONATHON GRAHAM, KENNETH JOHNSON and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Morgan et al v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv00929
Petitioner:
Steven Glen Craddock, Jonathon Graham, Kenneth Johnson and others
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6099
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6088
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00482
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02683
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Morgan et al v. United States The
as 5:2019cv00171
Respondent:
United States The
Petitioner:
Kenneth Johnson, David Brian Morgan, Danny Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. United States et al
as 5:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of, Federal Bureau of Indians and others
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv04028
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma, State of Oklahoma, United States and others
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson, Cleve Billings, Ernest Moncada and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Governor of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
