Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Askew v. Burl et al
as 2:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Mu'min Abdulaziz Askew
Defendant:
Danny Burl, DeAngelo Earl, David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Winston v. Charles Stewart, et al
as 14-2521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles A. Winston
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Stewart, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Lathan Ester, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Danny Burl, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Kelley v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Kelley, Jr
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, John Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D Morgan
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Danny Burl, DeAngelo Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Burl et al
as 2:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Anthony Washington
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Todd Ball, David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Earl et al
as 2:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Jackson
Defendant:
DeAngelo Earl, Michael Williams, Douglas Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Earl et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Roy Wallace
Defendant:
DeAngelo Earl, Danny Burl, Larry May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Stewart et al
as 2:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Charles A Winston
Defendant:
Charles Stewart, Lathan Ester, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Tommy Mosley
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Dale Condiff, Cindy Wilde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. Lay et al
as 5:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Shannon Boyle
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay , Vernon Robertson , DeAngelo Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
