Cases 31 - 40 of 109
James v. Davis
as 4:2019cv03190
Petitioner:
Dean Johnson James
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Bauman
as 2:2019cv12423
Respondent:
Catherine S. Bauman
Petitioner:
Mr. Andrew Dean Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Auger Drilling Inc et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv01376
Defendant:
Dean Johnson, Karol Johnson and Dean Basil Johnson
Debtor:
Auger Drilling, Inc
Plaintiff:
Coyle Whitten, Auger Drilling Inc and W Coyle Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Logan Owsley v. Mark Gorbett, et al
as 19-1825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOGAN A. OWSLEY, in his individual capacity and as Administrator of the ESTATE OF CARY OWSLEY,
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIE L. NUNEMAKER, WILLIAM R. KINMAN, JR., MARK E. GORBETT, in his individual and official capacities as Sheriff of Bartholomew County and others
Dean-Johnson v. Sorkhabi
as 2:2018cv02382
Plaintiff:
Renee Dean-Johnson
Defendant:
Hamed Sorkhabi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. City of Atwater et al
as 1:2018cv00920
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson
Defendant:
Deol Lakhwinder, Samuel Joseph, Jim Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. City of Atwater et al
as 1:2018at00497
Defendant:
City of Atwater, Samuel Joseph, Jim Price and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis
as 4:2017cv00057
Petitioner:
Alfred Dean Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Johnson et al v. City of Atwater et al
as 1:2016cv01636
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson
Defendant:
City of Atwater , Frank Pietro , Samuel Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
