Cases 31 - 40 of 328
Human Rights Defense Center v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Maryland Montgomery County, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Warden Suzy Malagaria
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Big Birds, LLC v. CC Beauty Collection Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03594
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, President Stacy Kaufman, CC Beauty Collection Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Big Birds, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Holmes et al v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv03392
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Department, JOHN DOES 1-10, The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lee, Juaqueta Bullock, Lauren Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Impact Applications, Inc. v. Concussion Management, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv03108
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Concussion Management, LLC, Steven E. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Impact Applications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lincoln v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 1:2019cv02741
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Mark Lincoln and Arthur Buege
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
