Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Fleig v. Castle Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08623
Defendant:
Richard J. Lampen, John F Beaudette, Mark E Andrews III and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Fleig
Donovan v. Castle Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08644
Plaintiff:
Michael Donovan
Defendant:
Steven D. Rubin, Dr. Phillip Frost, Richard J. Lampen and others
Dugan v. Castle Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08550
Defendant:
Richard J. Lampen, Dr. Phillip Frost, Dr. Richard M. Krasno and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Dugan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Pinkerton v. Ascension Mercy Hospital et al
as 2:2019cv01102
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V Pinkerton
Defendant:
Ascension Mercy Hospital, Robert Marx, Michelle M Hermes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Rodrigues et al
as 7:2019cv00141
Plaintiff:
Artemio Miranda Manuel
Defendant:
Dr. Phillips Seeck, L. Rodrigues and Warden Jorge Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiger et al v. Gator's Dockside Group, Inc.
as 0:2019cv61411
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tiger and Casey Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Gator's Dockside Group, Inc., Gator's Dockside of Dr. Phillips, Inc. and Gator's Dockside of Ocoee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PYATT v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02444
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MARIO COLUCCI, WARDEN DAVID BYRNES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL PYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stechauner v. Jess et al
as 2:2019cv00833
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Judy Smith, Eric Toney and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew C Stechauner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 2:2019cv01971
Defendant:
DR. PHILLIPS, C/O BAGWELL, C/O CAMPAGNA and others
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-2001
Not Yet Classified:
MICHAEL DIAMOND, P.A., NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS, ANGELA MERLO, Individually and in her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
