Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Vaughn v. Anderson County et al
as 8:2015cv01954
Plaintiff:
Earnest E Vaughn, Sr
Defendant:
Anderson County, Sheriff Skipper, M W Hunnicutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Brown et al
as 4:2015cv00865
Plaintiff:
Nathanael L Reynolds
Defendant:
Tyler B Brown, Kimberly V Barr and Earnest A Finney, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA
as 6:2014cv02558
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Earnest Jermaine Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James v. Jones et al
as 0:2013cv01869
Plaintiff:
Jerome W James
Defendant:
Carl Jones, Manuel Alfas, Jennifer Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Vaughn v. State, The et al
as 8:2012cv02405
Plaintiff:
Earnest E Vaughn, Sr
Defendant:
State, The, Anderson Co Solicitors Office, Lauren Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. Powell et al
as 3:2012cv00747
Plaintiff:
Beattie B Ashmore
Defendant:
Earnest Powell and Alice Baker-Powell
Counter_claimant:
Earnest Powell and Alice Baker-Powell
Counter_defendant:
Beattie B Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. City Police of Columbia Dept, The et al
as 3:2011cv02594
Plaintiff:
Earnest M Johnson
Defendant:
City Police of Columbia Dept, The, Douglas A Shuler and K C Chatara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA
as 6:2011cv70048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Earnest Jermaine Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barfield et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Susie A Barfield, Tommy G Barton, Sr, Charles R Beard and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Jimmy Thornton and Mike Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
